To fight against this odious discrimination, one would think that the proper approach would be a reaffirmation of this principle Republican
"Men are born and remain free and equal in rights"
Well not at all, it is not egalitarianism that opposes discrimination but ... another form of discrimination: the "positive" discrimination .
There would be a good and bad discrimination? "Positive discrimination" and a "negative discrimination"? Without look far, it sniffs the air very fast in time which falls within the oxymoron or redundant.
Thus feminism claims to fight against machismo, misogyny, misandry cons and cons parity sexism, as if an injustice could erase another, as if a plague could eradicate the other.

Boulevard of affirmative
Indeed, wanting to travel on what was formerly a Parisian boulevard has very serious consequences. Instead of trying to convince my friends to finish their journey by public transport, or better still in vélib I selfishly agreed to make available my spacious vehicle. In doing so, I have not had the slightest thought to the enormous quantity of carbon dioxide that my wild journey did not fail to generate. Guilty of discrimination against pedestrians, cyclists, prams, strollers, pigeons, sparrows, and other citizens, non-polluting models, so it was just that I am, in my turn, the victim of a punishment commensurate with my fault.
Therefore, and following a coercive logic developed by the political commissars ecology triumphant, it was urgent to transform this simple trip ordeal. This imbecility that is to cause traffic congestion by reducing traffic lanes of the bastards of motorists to a minimum will certainly convince my friends, the next time they travel, crossing the RER turnstiles with their two travel bags, their dog and their daughter for five years unless they can to cram it all in panière of ... a vélib
And worst of all this is that the concept of catastrophic "positive discrimination" is not illuminated in green, far from it. There is even a very senior official that we proposed, there is little to institutionalize ...